Contraceptives and Convictions
wilkyjr printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Wed Feb 15, 2012 at 02:23:33 PM EST
"...I have often said that religion and politics are always connected, that there is no fixed template for their interaction, and that the dynamic relationship has always been a work in progress set in its time and place."  Charles Kimball
The recent reversal of the Obama administration regarding Catholic institutions and contraceptives caused quite a media blaze.  Jon Stewart mocked the Catholic priest who lamented that there is an all out war against Christians in the nation.  A couple of items in the contraceptive story were not mentioned.  For one, the law did not apply to churches.  For another, few know that much of the funding that comes to these universities comes from the government.

Brent walker, of the Baptist Joint Committee recommended the President revisit the contraceptive issue.  He feared a problematic issue of religious liberty was at stake.  Even though the vast majority of Catholics were not against the mandate, the leaders of the church disagreed.  I have no problem with birth control personally, but understanding the issue of religious liberty means that when one loses their liberty, we all lose some.

Kimball noted in my introduction that there is always a "work in progress" in this clash.  He notes that the founders of the nation set up a government that could have executed Sabbath breakers.  He is well aware of the problems when church runs state or vice versa.

Wheaton College professor and ex- legislator Amy Black has written an interesting book about the intersection of church and state.  Amy is an advocate of separation.  She notes in her book, Beyond Left and Right, that there is no mention of God in the U.S. Constitution.  She notes, "In the common conversation about religion and American politics, most people talk in terms of `church and state.'  At the extremes, one camp raises the alarm that the United State is in danger of becoming a theocracy, while the other worries that God has been entirely removed from the public life."  This viewpoint reminds me of Father Coughlin who said he only had two choices, Communism or Fascism, and he chose Fascism.  Most of us would reply that there are lots of other options, Father.

The latest version of the Texas Fundamentalist newspaper carries an editorial from the editor who wrote that Jimmy Carter was the worst President in the last 100 years.     He might sound strangely opinionated to some and offend many of the church members who liked Carter, but he has a right to his view.  

JFK said , "I believe in an America where the separation of church is absolute--where no Catholic prelate would tell the President...how to act,"   If we are to believe a recent book published by a female Aid to the President, he also believed in separation of his faith from his lifestyle.  Kennedy helped define the issue while LBJ helped legislate the policy that churches are still to abide by.  A recent report by Catholic female students claims that these women desire the contraceptives.  There is an apparent disconnect between the pulpit and the pew.  Some studies suggest Southern Baptist laymen support abortion choices.  This further complicates the debate.

Church and State magazine claims a Saudi woman who was 75 was given 40 lashes and four months in prison for "mingling."  A 19 year old rape victim was also given 200 lashes and 6 months in prison.  Folks need to recall stories like this when they claim we are near to a theocracy.  When reports circulate that over $390 million is spent each year in the nation for Christian lobbyists it is hard to conclude that Christians are being banished from the public square.

Catholic charities gets most of its funds from the government.  Baptist children's homes are mostly funded by tax dollars.  A local county boasts it now sentences wayward youth to attend church.  The agency doing such assures me the District Attorney says this is legal. In Minnesota an Islamic school has been given over $2 million in public funding.  The template still needs work.  

Obviously our society is somewhere  between a theocracy and a place where faith is banished from the public square. Fleshing out how exactly it works is still being defined.  You can raise more money by alarmist statements claiming either extreme is the norm.  It does not help in the civil discourse in doing such.  

I have known several key Christian leaders from Tyler, Texas.  None of them even knew who Gary North, the famous Christian Reconstruction was.  His headquarters is there.  In the same light the small group who sought to use the courts to stop Perry's The Response, only served to help raise boatloads of money for the American Family Association.  

Vanderbilt University has a church/state group working to ease some of these tensions.  The name of its publication is, Finding Common Ground.  A healthy title for a difficult yet much needed proposition for hostile times.  




Display:
In an ideal world, of course, the whole issue of funding women's health needs would be moot because we would have a single-payer system not dependent on the beliefs (and bottom lines) of individual employers. Since I don't think that is going to happen any time soon, how do we work toward the common good? It is not helpful when a member of the church hierarchy calls for Christians to "violently oppose" any effort to provide birth control coverage for employees of church-owned businesses. (See my comment under Frank Cocozelli's most recent post for details.)

I note that many Congressional members who are loudest at supporting a "conscience clause" by proclaiming "not one cent of tax money for abortion/birth control" are quite willing to disregard the consciences of those of us who, on religious and moral grounds, object to having more than half of our income tax money going to fund war. How do we as a nation decide whose religious conscience is accommodated and whose is ignored?

by MLouise on Wed Feb 15, 2012 at 04:09:58 PM EST

Non-violent solutions are much needed.  Harsh language like "waged war against" is taken seriously by many.  Today Nancy Grace refused to back down on her unfounded allegations. (Grace suggested Whitney might have been drowned by some aid.) Her use of language once caused a woman's suicide.  Less volatile words and accurate information is needed...even it it doesn't sell things.  

by wilkyjr on Thu Feb 16, 2012 at 09:00:05 AM EST
When you have people dedicated to dictating your thoughts and actions and using the law to do so (i.e. take over America for Christ) and who have been training/planning for using politics and violence to accomplish their goals (Jesus Camp anyone?), it's rather difficult to find balance with such types.  I know I'm in the minority here, but trying to be "nice" to dominionists doesn't work, and when they use loaded words against us (as they demonstratively do all the time) and we don't call them for what they are and speak plainly, we loose.

They're using emotions to reach people and to manipulate and control.  Intellectual attempts are just not as strong - you can't convert intelligent people over to fundamentalism through their intellects, but they do it all the time by using emotions.  That's how they catch people on university campuses.  It's how they caught me decades back.  It was deliberate.  They know what they're doing.

What we need to do is have the same impact (intellectual exercises do NOT cut it) through our words, but back them up with the facts and intellect.  We need to reach people, and we're already at a disadvantage - because we're competing with Reality TV and other junk "entertainment" and against overt propagandizing.  Those all blanket the emotional channels and it takes something strong to break through.

When the first preacher started saying that "Christianity" (their version) needed to be forced on others (using whatever words/language to make it sound reasonable), it immediately became an "us vs them" situation.  They view our demanding that our rights be respected as an attack on their beliefs.  We would like to get along with them, but how do you get along with people dedicated to forcing their views on others?

I won't repeat what I've said about compromises between ex-slaves and their former masters, but it applies here.

I might add that I'm not willing to sacrifice what little freedom I have or my future in an attempt to not "sell things".  We are in a life-or-death struggle (that is REALLY the truth for walkaways, less so for people who aren't) and anything less than our strongest effort is inviting defeat.

by ArchaeoBob on Fri Feb 17, 2012 at 12:46:24 PM EST
Parent



I think that Catholic non-church organizations (hospitals and universities) have a right to object as noisily as they like to the requirement that they provide contraceptives as part of health insurance.

I like Obama's solution in that the Catholic Church doesn't actually buy the contraception, but it can only buy one-size-fits-all insurance that includes contraceptive coverage. The Church merely gets some unintended consequences (contraceptive coverage) along with its stated and doctrine-compatible goal (providing health insurance).

I have seen arguments that "unintended consequences" aren't sinful because will is absent. This could be an "out" for the Catholic non-church institutions, if they desired to use it.

I found the situation of the Georgetown student in the NYT article disturbing. Oral contraceptive hormone formulations are commonly used for non-contraceptive medical purposes, polycystic ovarian syndrome being just one such disease treated with OC-formulated hormones. In the past, it was perfectly acceptable for Catholic physicians at Catholic hospitals to prescribe OC hormones for these non-OC uses. The doctors now seem to be forced to go against the national standards of care in many cases.

by NancyP on Thu Feb 16, 2012 at 02:58:14 PM EST


Lots of us do tend to forget that contraceptive pills are not only used for preventing conception.

by wilkyjr on Fri Feb 17, 2012 at 09:40:04 AM EST

"When reports circulate that over $390 million is spent each year in the nation for Christian lobbyists"

Do you by chance have a reference for that (so I could read the report)?  I'd like to find it if possible, as I get hit with "Christians are being evicted from the public square" on a regular basis.

by ArchaeoBob on Fri Feb 17, 2012 at 12:15:12 PM EST


Looked in files and cannot come up with exact source yet.  It is from a recent Issue of Church and State. The single largest lobby group is the  American Israeli Affairs Committee spending almost $88 million.   Catholic Bioshops spend $26.2 million per year.

by wilkyjr on Mon Feb 20, 2012 at 09:36:39 AM EST

The author navigates the complex intersection of religion and politics, focusing on recent controversies like the contraceptive mandate.  Lab grown diamonds They highlight the importance of religious liberty but acknowledge the challenges in defining the boundaries between church and state. The author emphasizes the ongoing evolution of this relationship and the need for civil discourse to find common ground.

by isabelladom on Tue Sep 12, 2023 at 03:13:12 PM EST


WWW Talk To Action


Cognitive Dissonance & Dominionism Denial
There is new research on why people are averse to hearing or learning about the views of ideological opponents. Based on evaluation of five......
By Frederick Clarkson (375 comments)
Will the Air Force Do Anything To Rein In Its Dynamic Duo of Gay-Bashing, Misogynistic Bloggers?
"I always get nervous when I see female pastors/chaplains. Here is why everyone should as well: "First, women are not called to be pastors,......
By Chris Rodda (203 comments)
The Legacy of Big Oil
The media is ablaze with the upcoming publication of David Grann's book, Killers of the Flower Moon. The shocking non fiction account of the......
By wilkyjr (111 comments)
Gimme That Old Time Dominionism Denial
Over the years, I have written a great deal here and in other venues about the explicitly theocratic movement called dominionism -- which has......
By Frederick Clarkson (101 comments)
History Advisor to Members of Congress Completely Twists Jefferson's Words to Support Muslim Ban
Pseudo-historian David Barton, best known for his misquoting of our country's founders to promote the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation,......
By Chris Rodda (113 comments)
"Christian Fighter Pilot" Calls First Lesbian Air Force Academy Commandant a Liar
In a new post on his "Christian Fighter Pilot" blog titled "BGen Kristin Goodwin and the USAFA Honor Code," Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan......
By Chris Rodda (144 comments)
Catholic Right Leader Unapologetic about Call for 'Death to Liberal Professors' -- UPDATED
Today, Donald Trump appointed C-FAM Executive Vice President Lisa Correnti to the US Delegation To UN Commission On Status Of Women. (C-FAM is a......
By Frederick Clarkson (126 comments)
Controlling Information
     Yesterday I listened to Russ Limbaugh.  Rush advised listeners it would be best that they not listen to CNN,MSNBC, ABC, CBS and......
By wilkyjr (118 comments)
Is Bannon Fifth-Columning the Pope?
In December 2016 I wrote about how White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who likes to flash his Catholic credentials when it comes to......
By Frank Cocozzelli (251 comments)
Ross Douthat's Hackery on the Seemingly Incongruous Alliance of Bannon & Burke
Conservative Catholic writer Ross Douthat has dissembled again. This time, in a February 15, 2017 New York Times op-ed titled The Trump Era's Catholic......
By Frank Cocozzelli (64 comments)
`So-Called Patriots' Attack The Rule Of Law
Every so often, right-wing commentator Pat Buchanan lurches out of the far-right fever swamp where he has resided for the past 50 years to......
By Rob Boston (161 comments)
Bad Faith from Focus on the Family
Here is one from the archives, Feb 12, 2011, that serves as a reminder of how deeply disingenuous people can be. Appeals to seek......
By Frederick Clarkson (177 comments)
The Legacy of George Wallace
"One need not accept any of those views to agree that they had appealed to real concerns of real people, not to mindless, unreasoning......
By wilkyjr (70 comments)
Betsy DeVos's Mudsill View of Public Education
My Talk to Action colleague Rachel Tabachnick has been doing yeoman's work in explaining Betsy DeVos's long-term strategy for decimating universal public education. If......
By Frank Cocozzelli (80 comments)
Prince and DeVos Families at Intersection of Radical Free Market Privatizers and Religious Right
This post from 2011 surfaces important information about President-Elect Trump's nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos. -- FC Erik Prince, Brother of Betsy......
By Rachel Tabachnick (218 comments)

Respect for Others? or Political Correctness?
The term "political correctness" as used by Conservatives and Republicans has often puzzled me: what exactly do they mean by it? After reading Chip Berlin's piece here-- http://www.talk2action.org/story/2016/7/21/04356/9417 I thought about what he explained......
MTOLincoln (253 comments)
Fear
What I'm feeling now is fear.  I swear that it seems my nightmares are coming true with this new "president".  I'm also frustrated because so many people are not connecting all the dots! I've......
ArchaeoBob (107 comments)
"America - love it or LEAVE!"
I've been hearing that and similar sentiments fairly frequently in the last few days - far FAR more often than ever before.  Hearing about "consequences for burning the flag (actions) from Trump is chilling!......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)
"Faked!" Meme
Keep your eyes and ears open for a possible move to try to discredit the people openly opposing Trump and the bigots, especially people who have experienced terrorism from the "Right"  (Christian Terrorism is......
ArchaeoBob (165 comments)
More aggressive proselytizing
My wife told me today of an experience she had this last week, where she was proselytized by a McDonald's employee while in the store. ......
ArchaeoBob (163 comments)
See if you recognize names on this list
This comes from the local newspaper, which was conservative before and took a hard right turn after it was sold. Hint: Sarah Palin's name is on it!  (It's also connected to Trump.) ......
ArchaeoBob (169 comments)
Unions: A Labor Day Discussion
This is a revision of an article which I posted on my personal board and also on Dailykos. I had an interesting discussion on a discussion board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it......
Xulon (180 comments)
Extremely obnoxious protesters at WitchsFest NYC: connected to NAR?
In July of this year, some extremely loud, obnoxious Christian-identified protesters showed up at WitchsFest, an annual Pagan street fair here in NYC.  Here's an account of the protest by Pagan writer Heather Greene......
Diane Vera (130 comments)
Capitalism and the Attack on the Imago Dei
I joined this site today, having been linked here by Crooksandliars' Blog Roundup. I thought I'd put up something I put up previously on my Wordpress blog and also at the DailyKos. As will......
Xulon (331 comments)
History of attitudes towards poverty and the churches.
Jesus is said to have stated that "The Poor will always be with you" and some Christians have used that to refuse to try to help the poor, because "they will always be with......
ArchaeoBob (149 comments)
Alternate economy medical treatment
Dogemperor wrote several times about the alternate economy structure that dominionists have built.  Well, it's actually made the news.  Pretty good article, although it doesn't get into how bad people could be (have been)......
ArchaeoBob (90 comments)
Evidence violence is more common than believed
Think I've been making things up about experiencing Christian Terrorism or exaggerating, or that it was an isolated incident?  I suggest you read this article (linked below in body), which is about our great......
ArchaeoBob (214 comments)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.