Religious right threatens lawsuit over provision of stimulus bill
The key phrase Jay Sekulow hopes you don't notice--and, I suspect, what Don Wildmon hopes you don't notice--is "substantial portion." It would seem to me this section's intent is to prohibit the use of this money to help renovate any building whose primary purpose is religious--that is, an on-campus chapel or something along those lines. DeMint tried to introduce an amendment stripping out this provision--but it failed largely along party lines, 54-43. And yet, according to Thomas, no House Repub tried to cut this out when this bill was under consideration in the House--even though the House Repubs are much more influenced by the religious right than their Senate counterparts. The sad part about it is that a large number of religious right people are already up in arms about this. Remember, you're talking about people who, for the most part, live their lives in a fundie cocoon--homeschooling their kids, filtered Internet service, SkyAngel satellite, etc. Most of them probably rely heavily on CBN and OneNewsNow to get their news.
Religious right threatens lawsuit over provision of stimulus bill | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
Religious right threatens lawsuit over provision of stimulus bill | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
|
||||||||||||
|